.COM vs New gTLDs: Which Delivers Better ROI?
- π°
.COM Delivers the Highest Historical ROI
.COM domains consistently appreciate over time, with stronger demand, higher resale values, and better liquidity.
- π
.COM Has Global Trust and Recognition
Users worldwide instinctively trust .COM, making it the most valuable extension for businesses and investors.
- π
New gTLDs Offer Lower Entry Costs
Investors can acquire high-quality keywords in new extensions for a fraction of .COM prices, increasing potential upside.
- π
Some gTLDs Provide Strong Branding Opportunities
Extensions like .app, .tech, and .ai appeal to modern startups looking for creative and industry-specific identities.
- π§²
.COM Has Higher Buyer Demand
Businesses prefer .COM for credibility and long-term branding, making sales more frequent and profitable.
- β οΈ
New gTLDs Come With Higher Risk
Limited public awareness, inconsistent pricing, and renewal fees can make some new extensions less stable investments.
- π
ROI Depends on Keyword-Extension Fit
A perfect match like βloans.onlineβ may outperform a weak .COM, proving that context matters in gTLD valuation.
- π
Many New gTLDs Struggle With Resale Liquidity
Even good names in new extensions can take longer to sell due to smaller buyer pools.
- π¦
.COM Is Easier to Monetize and Develop
SEO trust, direct type-in traffic, and universal acceptance make .COM more effective for websites and branding.
- π‘
New gTLDs Can Offer Niche ROI Opportunities
Single-word new gTLDs tied to trending industries can produce high ROI when demand spikes.
- π
Overall Winner: .COM for Stability and ROI
.COM remains the strongest long-term investment, while new gTLDs are better suited for calculated, niche plays.